TEEN LOGIC: Why is a 15-year-old taxiing passengers on I-380 in Iowa?

Steve Lombardi
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 335
Visit Steve Lombardi on FacebookVisit Steve Lombardi on LinkedInVisit Steve Lombardi on TwitterVisit Steve Lombardi on Avvo
Posted by Steve LombardiSeptember 12, 2009 9:00 AM

Can we start with an assumption: That interstate highways are a dangerous place due to cars and semi trucks driving at higher speeds; due also to wrong-way drivers, drunks and inexperienced drivers. Now let's talk this morning about youthful inexperience, distracted driving and cheating the law that is intended to save youthful lives. After we look at this mornings news item from the Des Moines Register I'm going to end with a warning to the parents who cheat by asking the wrong question and focusing their children's attention on the lawyers rather than youthful inexperience.

NEWS ITEM:

A 15-year-old driver rolled a white minivan as she neared the Iowa River on Interstate-380 in Johnson County. In the van were two 16-year-old passengers. One was reported to have died and the other taken to University Hospitals in Iowa City.

LET'S ANALYZE THE LAW AND THE FACTS:

All were apparently high school students who’d just finished a volleyball game and were heading out to get a bite to eat. The 15-year-old driver was Rachel Stewart of North Liberty. Her two passengers were Alyssa Benedict and Rachel Petersen. Young Ms. Benedict is listed as the fatality.

“Clear Creek Amana Principal Tom McDonald said Benedict and two friends were apparently going to get something to eat after attending a volleyball game at the school in Tiffin.”

  • What was the reason the van lost control and rolled over?
  • What was the reason the van ended up off the road and onto the median?
  • Were there distractions inside the van that caused this inexperienced driver to lose control?
  • Does the law even allow a special license permittee to be taxiing passengers on a food run?
  • Was this errand going to allow them to get home before the permit curfew?

In Iowa a 15-year-old can drive with a learner’s permit and a school permit. Those permits allow them to drive directly to and from school-related functions, like volleyball. The permissible hours are 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. This accident is reported to have happened at 8:45 p.m. Passengers are allowed to ride along but I’m not sure the law allows the driver to veer from the most direct route between home and school or the extracurricular activity. Reports indicate that Benedict and Petersen were not wearing seat belts. Another report has the van entering the median area before rolling over. But let’s get back to the time sequence to decide if this trip was a good idea for teens, so that teens can learn from the mistakes made in this case and to stay out of future trouble.

Reports show they were at a school event at Clear Creek Amana in Tiffin. The driver lived in North Liberty, the two passengers in Tiffin, Iowa. At the time of the collision they were driving south on I-380, a four lane divided highway. The collision occurred at the 8 mile marker. It should be clear that if you’re at a school in Tiffin and the two passengers live in Tiffin then there’s no reason to be on I-380 taxiing passengers; no matter how hungry they may be. Tiffin is west of I-380 and North Liberty is northwest of Tiffin. Using MapQuest shows there are 8.31 miles between the two towns; a drive that takes a mere 13 minutes to drive and doesn’t include any travel being necessary on I-380. In other words I-380 isn’t a direct route. So why were they even on I-380?

The MapQuest directions include E 3rd Street toward Main Street, then right onto Main Street, turn right onto E. Marengo Road/U.S. 6 East, then left onto Coral Ridge Ave., turn right on E. Penn Street, then right on N. Dubuque Street to North Liberty.

Google Maps shows the direct route.

http://maps.google.com/maps?f=d&source=s_d&saddr=Tiffin,+Iowa&daddr=NOrth+liberty,+Iowa&hl=en&geocode=&mra=ls&sll=41.707679,-91.675351&sspn=0.002423,0.005659&ie=UTF8&t=h&z=14


View Larger Map

The question remains to be answered whether the law allowed this special minor driver to even be on I-380 and then whether it was possible to get something to eat and get everyone home by the permitted curfew of 10 p.m.

Of course there is also the question of whether these teens could legally make this food run.

“The reason Stewart lost control of the van has not been made public by the Iowa State Patrol. McDonald said he received an unconfirmed report that a rear tire had blown.”

State law allows young drivers with learner’s permits and a school permit to drive to and from school for school-related activities. The Code section is 321.194 Special minors’ licenses. Here is what is written. The drive must take the most direct or accessible route and can only drive between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. over the most direct and accessible route between the licensee’s residence and schools of enrollment or the closets school bus stop or public transportation service and between schools or enrollment, for the purpose of attending classes or extracurricular activities within the school district. That’s a mouthful and these code sections aren’t easily understood. Generally they are allowed to have passengers but they can’t have more passengers than there are seat belts, a requirement that implies seat belts must be worn.

So let’s recap the mistakes that were made:

1. Not wearing seatbelts.

2. Driving on an Interstate.

3. Driving a route that is not a direct or permissible route.

4. Taxiing passengers for a food run.

5. Trying to squeeze in too many stops in two short a period of time.

6. Disobeying the law that requires teens not to drive except to and from school events. Last I checked McDonald’s isn’t a school event and they don’t have classes.

7. Were there distractions in the van that caused the driver to lose control? We may never know.

Does the law allow the driver to taxi passengers for the convenience of parents? I’m not sure I would agree that it does. Was all of this avoidable? Absolutely. One of the lessons to learn is for parents to stop distracting teens with asking the wrong questions; stupid questions such as why are there so many lawsuits? Hate the lawyers all you want but start asking the right question; the one that will reduce the number of accidents and in turn the number of lawsuits.

What were the distractions in the van?

Why were these kids thinking they could cheat the law intended to keep them safe?

Why was the youthful driver being a taxi driver?

Why were they even on I-380?

If adults knew they were going on a food run, why didn't someone step up and say, "No." you're not allowed to do that. Do it and I'm calling your parents.

Why wasn't everyone wearing their seatbelts?

If there were cell phones in the van, why? What purpose did they serve?

If there was texting going on why? Why is it necessary to pay attention not to texting but to driving?

And the most important question is...

Why are there so many accidents and injuries?

See Radio Iowa, Teenage girl killed, two others injured in eastern Iowa wreck

UPDATE: Teen Killed, Two Injured in I-380 Accident

NEWS UPDATE - 1 killed in rollover accident

I send my condolences to the families and rest my case.

We've been covering Interstate travel safety for the past two-weeks on the Injuryboard and a few of my fellow members have jawed about it nonstop. I know that Wayne Parsons, my friend Devon Glass from Michigan, Mike Bryant from Minnesota, Pierce Egerton from North Carolina and Rick Shapiro from Virginia will all join in with my sentiments about being frustrated. Parents frustrate us when they talk all about tort reform and then turn a blind eye to what their children do. Tort reform isn't about the other guy, it's about us and the decisions we make. Tort reform is actually a distraction from the root cause of injuries and accidents. Taking away the rights of people to receive compensation isn't going to stop the accidents that cause injury and death. All tort reform will do is make those injured or the families of those killed miserable. So stop distracting everyone with taking away the right to receive compensation and ignoring the root causes of injury and death on the highways of America. If you have questions about what we’ve written call or write to each of us. We don’t ask that you agree, but we do ask that you think and discuss the issues.

You can follow our discussion by reading these articles.

UPDATE FOR CONSIDERATION: A recent Des Moines Register article takes a look at the police investigation in another case involving Alyssa Jo Vdnerhoff, a 15-year-old who lost her life when the truck she was driving went out of control and rolled. They wondered if she was text messaging, either reading or sending at the time when she lost control. Vanderhoff was from Marathon and was Iowa's only female bull rider.

I think this series on interstate highway safety is concluding with this post. Here is the series we ran. Our next series will start in a few days. Being busy lawyers it's not always easy to jump right into a new subject and have copy ready for print.

Are Double-Bottomed Semis More or Less Dangerous to You? - Devon Glass from Church Wyble, P.C. (Michigan), August 26, 2009

Who wins and loses when a Ford Focus and a fully-loaded semi-truck crash? - Steve Lombardi from The Lombardi Law Firm (Iowa), August 25, 2009

Hawaii Freeway Chronicles #1: What Are The Danger Points On H-1, H-2 and H-3?, by Wayne Parsons of Wayne Parsons Law Offices. (Hawaii), August 27, 2009

The Interstate Highway Graveyard, “Speed Kills”, Lombardi, August 28, 2009

Why Speeders on the Highway Cause More Serious Accidents, Glass, August 28, 2009

Death and Injury On Interstate Highways Increase With Higher Speed Limits, Wayne Parsons, August 29, 2009 2:31 AM

Drunk Drivers Caused 40% of Traffic Fatalities In Hawaii In 2006, Wayne Parsons, August 31, 2009 12:16 AM

Interstate Highways Are No Place For Drunk Drivers Over The Labor Day Weekend, Wayne Parsons | September 01, 2009 4:36 PM

Uninsured Motorist Car Insurance: It’s Your Most Important Car Insurance and Here Is Why, Rick Shapiro, September 01, 2009 10:30 AM

Uninsured Drivers: Who Are These People?, Pierce Egerton , September 02, 2009 12:00 PM

Risky Drivers Don't Just Drive Drunk and Speed - They Often Don't have Insurance , Wayne Parsons, September 02, 2009 4:09PM

The National Uninsured: Why You Need Uninsured Motorist Coverage In Minnesota, Mike Bryant, September 04, 2009 3:24 PM

Uninsured Drivers On The Highways: Cause of Higher Rates of Injuries & Deaths?
Rick Shapiro |
September 07, 2009 1:15 PM

Highway Cowards - Running From Decency & Responsibility
Pierce Egerton |
September 08, 2009 8:08 PM

Deteriorated Interstate Highways And Roadways In Every State Add To Fatalities, Wayne Parsons, September 10, 2009

4 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Wayne ParsonsInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Wayne Parsons
September 13, 2009 1:36 AM

Thanks Steve for bringing the focus of this national effort of Injury Board attorneys on why death and injury accidents happen. The goal of injury prevention and protection of our youth is why I joined injury board and spend time educayting the public about what they can do to protect themselves. Thanks to Devon Glass and Pierce Egerton and Rick Shapiro and Mike Bryant this group is serving a great education effort.

I do disagree that the interstate Highway system is more dangerous than rural roads. In Hawaii I know that we have a bigger problem on on rural roads with automobile accidents. I think that the interstate highways actually reduce motor vehicle injury and death statistics if you look at numbers of drivers and miles driven. I wonder if anyone has those statistics handy. I'll look into it for a future article.

But the point is, I think, that things happen a lot faster on interstate highways and so a 15 year old is not the best at handling sudden challenges requiring a Van traveling 70 MPH. That is an accident waiting to happen. Why a legislature would pass a law like that is beyond me! Your point about the lawsuit abuse crowd blaming attorneys like you for what is wrong with the world should ask why laws like this get passed? I feel sick for the parents and I know how badly they feel. There is no point in adding to their grief. From Hawaii I send my thoughts to them. This is the hardest loss of all.

Mike BryantInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Mike Bryant
September 13, 2009 9:53 AM

Accidents can happen on any road, but as Wayne says the speeds can play a much bigger role on the interstate and I would add there is many more cars. It is rare to see a big pile up on rural roads and you see less big vehicles.
In Minnesota we passed a number of good changes last year concerning the number of kids that can be in cars together and when they could drive. A new driver in the family can lessen a lot of the day to day pressures for a big family, but if it's not safe, you might as well let teens run on the highway. Tough questions , but ones that need to be asked and hopefully get answered before tragedies happen.

Steve LombardiInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Steve Lombardi
September 13, 2009 10:09 AM

The original reason for the law had to do with the fall harvest and farmers, wives included, needing to be in the fields rather than running kids back and forth to town for wresting, basketball, baseball and football. Young farm teens were more experienced with driving and probably more level headed than today's urban youth with their cell phones. Farm kids drove tractors and other implements long before they were 14 so they had more experience with driving. Today's urban teens drive video cars and trucks, aren't getting exercise like farm chores that developed physical strength and a culture of safety. Times change and so should the law to accommodate safety issues. We need to increase the permit age to 16, P-E-R-I-O-D! On a daily basis in West Des Moines I see no fewer than 10 distracted drivers with cell phones either talking or texting. Both are similar to drunken drivers. Now if on a daily basis we encountered 10 drunken drivers without further ado we’d make changes. So why do we allow texting teens to get away with it? Is the 14-year-old permit in urban areas the disease of lazy and uncommitted parents?

Rick ShapiroInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Rick Shapiro
September 13, 2009 10:06 PM

Steve:
Virginia has no 15 year old special permits, and has some great rules now. 16 year olds with a full license can only have one under 18 friend in their car. And, at 17 it goes to two. VA did enact a texting ban but the truth is that the cell phone co. lobbyists only agreed because they knew its no different than talking and they did not want stronger legislative action on general cell phone use while driving.
Your article asks so many good questions I bet this school and others issue clarifications to the "special permit" rules for 15 year old "food runs" during sports.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard Des Moines

InjuryBoard Des Moines RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Des Moines is brought to you by The Lombardi Law Firm

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
The Lombardi Law Firm (866) 735-1102 Ext 335 www.lombardilaw.com/
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Ames, Ankeny, Boone, Clive, Des Moines, Grinnell, Jefferson, Leon, Marshalltown, Newton, Osceola, Oskaloosa, Ottumwa, Urbandalte, West Des Moines, Winterset
4200 Corporate DriveSuite 112, West Des Moines, Iowa 50266 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address