People who don't use their legal names are normally associated with special interest groups trying to sell a dream that doesn't exist. To deflect, rather than to respond factually, their modus operandi is to point to the legal profession attacking with name calling. Mr. Bones your statement is no different than most. What you should know is that I'm reporting a personal injury news item; not taking a position either against or in favor. Of course you knee jerked to this report, which shows you didn't really read the article, you just don't like anyone picking on US Cellular. Your reactive argument is a fact that exposes your special interest. If you have some special knowledge how about talking about routing issues or rerouting issues and possible explanations of what might have occurred.

Dleg: There already are limits on liability. Injured people have to prove liability based on known causes of action. If they do that they have to show the cause is related to the injury and then the extent of their injury. There are more limits than you might realize. I wonder if there should be more limits on corporate greed and ripoffs with selling crappy products that don't work as they are intended or sold. How much do the cell phone CEO's get in bonuses? And you're worried about one lawsuit about one dead person? Is it because the man's life isn't important to you or because the cell phone stream of income is a part of our national econimic insecurity?