Continued Debate over Taser Use in Texas

Steve Lombardi
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 335
Visit Steve Lombardi on FacebookVisit Steve Lombardi on LinkedInVisit Steve Lombardi on TwitterVisit Steve Lombardi on Avvo
Posted by Steve LombardiOctober 29, 2009 10:14 AM

What people don't seem to appreciate is why this debate continues. Like any tool of law enforcement Tasers can be misused. How and when they are being used has been the ongoing concern but the Canadian research is raising additional questions about how the Taser performs and whether or not the internal functioning of it is predictable or reliable. What has never been discussed or debated is whether the Taser works as it is intended to and how long they function in a reliable manner. Now take a look at this case. I have to wonder if the reporting by the officers should include in their reports how long they actually caused the voltage to be applied. Meaning did the Taser take over and jolt the arrestee longer than the officer intended.

According to a Star Telegram online article, Tasers are gaining acceptance, though there are some still who will not issue this weapon, such as Tarrant County Sheriff Dee Anderson. There are many that are issuing Tasers and believe it is a safer and a more beneficial option to guns. A recent case involving use of a Taser which killed the victim, has spurred this discussion once again.

Opposing Taser Use

The case of Michael Patrick Jacobs, age 24, gives evidence against the use of Tasers. Jacobs’ parents called the Fort Worth police because their son was creating problems for them. When the police arrived, he became aggressive, and was shot twice with a Taser, dying on April 18, 2009. According to the autopsy report done by Tarrant County Medical Examiner Dr. Nizam Peerwani, it was found his body was shot for 49 seconds during the first jolt, and 5 seconds the second time. His body was also found not to have contained any drugs and Peerwani ruled his death a homicide. It was reported that the police officer who pulled the trigger on the Taser did so for 49 seconds “unknowningly.”

http://cbs11tv.com/video/?id=45838@ktvt.dayport.com

“The Jacobs family is suing the city of Fort Worth and the Police Department for wrongful death.” Lt. Paul Henderson, chief of staff for the Fort Worth police department, said the case is undergoing investigation and is expected to go to a grand jury.

“Amnesty International reported this year that 351 people have died after being stunned with Tasers in the United States since June 2001. The organization has called on governments to suspend their use or limit them to life-threatening situations.”

Favoring Taser Use

Sheriff Departments which employ Tasers in Texas include Bexar, Dallas, Harris and Travis counties, as well as locally, more than 10 police departments (including Arlington, Dallas/Fort Worth Airport and Fort Worth) have trained their officers and equipped them with Tasers. “Proponents say officers who use Tasers, which deliver a 50,000-volt shock that can temporarily immobilize a suspect, fire a gun less often, helping protect both the suspect and officer in potentially deadly situations.”

It was reported that a 30% decrease in police shooting has occurred in 2000-2008 compared to the time period of 1992-2000, due to increased implementation of Tasers.

There is conflicting evidence that longer duration of taser jolts will cause death, which was suspected in Jacobs’ case. Dr. Jose A. Joglar, an associate professor of internal medicine at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, has said “there is no evidence longer duration Taser applications would necessarily put the heart at a higher risk of arrhythmia since the energy for each pulse is still low."

Tasers are growing in numbers, according Taser International’s website they have “sold more than 406,000 devices to law enforcement agencies in 29 out of the 33 largest U.S. cities.”

All agencies that purchase and give officers the use of Tasers, “must undergo at least six to eight hours of training, yearly certification and, in some cases, experience being stunned, according to the agencies and Taser officials.”

There are opposing views, among the public and enforcement officials, on whether Tasers should be used by police officers. Despite this, the truth of the matter is Tasers are growing in number among officers and departments.

See related blog on Texas Sheriff Refuses to Issue Tasers to his Officers.

Texas Sheriff Refuses to Issue Tasers to his Officers

Steve Lombardi | October 28, 2009 2:24 PM | 2 Comments Des Moines, IA

3 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Steve Malone
Posted by Steve Malone
October 29, 2009 11:06 AM

I am impressed, this is not the total fabrication I have come to expect from you concerning Tasers. I do take issue with your statement "A recent case involving use of a Taser which killed the victim, has spurred this discussion once again."
The only people that have ever died directly due to a taser fell and struck their heads. I believe there have been a total of 2 cases including the crazy nan in NYC that was swinging a long floresent light bulb at officers and a fine cop took his own life for that mistake. A Taser CANNOT cause a heart attack but it is very hard to prove 100% that a taser did not cause a particular heart attack (but as a personal injury trial lawyer, you know that all too well).

Steve Malone
Posted by Steve Malone
October 29, 2009 11:24 AM

Hot off the presses from Australia, where the lawyers do not outnumber the police:

Taser guns a priority for our frontline police 5 minutes ago New new statistics on Taser use in the NSW Police Force confirm they were an invaluable tool in hostile situations, according to Police Minister Michael Daley.

“The NSW Government has made the rollout of Taser stun guns a priority for our frontline police because we believe our officers should have the best equipment available to do what is ultimately a very tough job,” Mr Daley said.

“Even in the early stages of this rollout, the evidence is clear that this new form of defence is a powerful deterrent – often without being fired.

“Tasers have been used a total of 440 times since they were introduced for general duties police. In 256 of these instances – or 54 per cent – just drawing the Taser was enough to diffuse the situation.

“Of course, the voice is one of the most effective weapons we have which is why the Police continue to use this as the first line of defence,” Mr Daley said.

Mr Daley said the research confirmed that Tasers were being used for hostile situations where a gun may otherwise be needed with the majority of situations involving alcohol (37 per cent), mental illness (22 per cent) or domestic violence (14 per cent).

“The statistics also provide us with very strong evidence that the extensive training each officer is required to go through before taking a Taser into the field has resulted in what is an excellent record of use,” Mr Daley said.

NSW Police Commissioner Andrew Scipione said the rollout of the new Tasers was already proving to be a valuable investment.

“Immobilising people who are impaired by alcohol, drugs or mental issues is always going to be safer with a Taser than a hand gun when all other attempts to disarm a situation have failed.

“It also lessens the likelihood of injury to police, victims and bystanders.

“It’s also important to remember that every time a Taser is used, the footage from the in-built camera is reviewed by the Deputy Commissioner to make sure our officers are using these defence weapons to international best practice,” Mr Scipione said.

Mr Daley said the NSW Government’s $10 million rollout of X26Tasers to all Police First Response Units was well underway.

“I’m pleased to report that we’re on track to have all 1,962 Tasers deployed in the field by the end of
2010,” Mr Daley said.

Taser use within the NSW Police Force – October 2008 to October 2009

Breakdown of Factors related to Taser deployment

Alcohol related 37%
Mental Health related 22%
Domestic violence related 14%
Testing or other 27%

How Tasers were deployed:

Draw and cover 54%
Barbs deployed 20%
Drive Stun 12%
Testing related 10%
Multiple deployment 4%

Where Tasers have been deployed by premises type

Private residence 51%
Outdoor/public place 26%
Police station/hospital/
Justice centre 18%
Licensed premises 3%
Commercial business 2%
http://southern-courier.whereilive.com.au/news/story/taser-guns-a-priority-for-our-frontline-police/

Excited-Delirium.com
Posted by Excited-Delirium.com
October 29, 2009 7:00 PM

The claim that a taser "cannot" affect the heart is nothing but wishful thinking. The hubris-laced dreams of Taser International. Facts are: Prof Savard reviewed the stats and found a linear relationship between the duration of taser exposure and risk of death. Even Taser International recommends minimal exposure, and the reason they make this recommendation is obvious.

I'm not going to argue back and forth with taser fan boys, my blog already covers the evidence that exposes the hard reality that tasers certainly can cause death, through a variety of mechanisms, even in healthy adults. Even the AMA and Wake Forest's Dr. Bozeman have acknowledged that tasers can cause death.

Anyone that disagrees with this obvious truth is in denial.

Tasers can cause death.

Leave a comment

Have an opinion? There are 3 ways to leave a public comment (or click here to email the author privately).

For information on acceptable commenting practices, please visit Lifehacker's guide to weblog comments. Comments containing spam or profanity will be filtered or deleted.

Method 1: Guests

Provide the information below. Your email address will not be published or sold.

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Method 2: Facebook Users

Connect using your facebook account.

Method 3: InjuryBoard Members and Contributors

Please sign in

Comments:

5000 characters remaining.




Subscribe to InjuryBoard Des Moines

InjuryBoard Des Moines RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Des Moines is brought to you by The Lombardi Law Firm

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
The Lombardi Law Firm (866) 735-1102 Ext 335 www.lombardilaw.com/
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Ames, Ankeny, Boone, Clive, Des Moines, Grinnell, Jefferson, Leon, Marshalltown, Newton, Osceola, Oskaloosa, Ottumwa, Urbandalte, West Des Moines, Winterset
4200 Corporate DriveSuite 112, West Des Moines, Iowa 50266 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address