Texas Sheriff Refuses to Issue Tasers to his Officers

Steve Lombardi
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 335
Visit Steve Lombardi on FacebookVisit Steve Lombardi on LinkedInVisit Steve Lombardi on TwitterVisit Steve Lombardi on Avvo
Posted by Steve LombardiOctober 28, 2009 2:24 PM

Tarrant County Sheriff Dee Anderson has done his own testing of Tasers as well as research on cases using Tasers and according to CBS news in Fort Worth, Texas he's not handing them out to his department officers. The use of this weapon has grown in popularity with Texas police departments, but Anderson is more concerned with it causing deaths. He said that when “people have health issues or who have used alcohol or drugs, the electric shock could be deadly.” He feels the negative aspects of a Taser outweigh the positives. Though Anderson will not issue Tasers to his deputies, he noted that he is not against enforcement agencies employing the weapon, saying "I completely respect others who decide to use them. I'm not a crusader against Tasers. I'm not out telling people not to use them. Everyone has to make the decision right for them.”

http://cbs11tv.com/video/?id=47391@ktvt.dayport.com

A recent incident which supports Anderson’s case of not using Tasers, involved a Taser being employed and caused the death of 24 year old Michael Jacobs in April 2009.

See related blog on Taser Debate spurs acceptance or refusal of Tasers.

3 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Tom Bradford
Posted by Tom Bradford
October 28, 2009 8:49 PM

How about another opinion Steve?
DURHAM -- Equipping Durham police with Tasers has been a huge success, saving money and reducing injuries during the first year of use, according to a police lieutenant who has just completed a study of how the electric shock weapons have affected the department.

"The Tasers have done everything we expected them to do,'' Lt. John Shelton said. "The effects have been exactly what we expected them to be, if not more.''

Shelton said some people had worried that giving Tasers to police would encourage them to use them too often, but he said that hasn't been the case.

"There was a fear that when we deployed Tasers into the field that officers would be Taser-happy, where our uses of force would skyrocket," he said. This is what his figures show:

The number of times an officer used "force applications," which may include using force more than once on the same person, dropped steadily from fiscal year 2006 to 2008 -- from 175 to 119, but then rose to 197 during the most recent period when officers had Tasers in the field, in large part because the weapons were often misfired during the initial phase when officers were getting used to them.

However, figures for "force incidents," which is the number of arrests where force is used, has dropped steadily, from 152 in fiscal year 2006 to 95 this fiscal year.

"We didn't have a massive jump in uses of force, so it's not like officers are using the Taser against everybody," Shelton said.

Shelton said Durham police have used Tasers 118 times since the first 110 weapons were put into use last summer and 125 more were later added. But, again, he said that figure is misleading, because of the misfirings during those first weeks of use.

A big advantage of Tasers has been as a deterrent, he said, prompting many arrest suspects to comply with police orders instead of fighting.

In the first three months this year, police documented 97 cases of "voluntary compliances," in which an arrest suspect "drastically changed their behavior because the Taser was present," according to Shelton's study.

"That's a potential physical force encounter, a potential foot chase [that's avoided]," he said. "And any time you start going up the force continuum and the level of resistance, then you add to the potential risks of injury."

"It has an umbrella effect," Shelton said. "The fewer times we have to call for help and have somebody run [police car] lights and siren, the fewer potential car wrecks and injuries we have and the lower cost for Workers Compensation claims. There's a far-reaching effect."

The cost of Workers Compensation claims for all Durham police employees fell from $657,413 last fiscal year to just $187,202 in the current fiscal year, he said. "That's almost a half a million dollar savings," he said.

As for police foot chases, they're down from 112 in fiscal year 2007-08 to 85 this fiscal year, he said.

"These voluntary compliances are suspects who may be thinking about running or resisting or fighting, but change their mind because a Taser is there," Shelton said.

Shelton also said there were four incidents this year where an officer "had justified use of lethal force" but used the Taser instead, preventing a suspect from being shot or possibly killed.

The department has 235 Tasers for a force of 512, but with the program's success, the goal is eventually to provide one for every officer.

"We have achieved our goals with the Taser, and I think we're all pleasantly surprised at how well the program is doing," Shelton said.
More ... +use+aids+police%20&id=3247254-Taser+use+aids+police&instance=main_article

Mike BryantInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Mike Bryant
October 28, 2009 11:31 PM

Tom, the key to that article is that they are being used correctly and judicially. I'm all for them using guns and all sorts of police weapons if they are used as trained and correctly.

Steve LombardiInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Steve Lombardi
October 29, 2009 9:26 AM

Tom: Thanks for the comment and the article. I'd say if the facts are accurate and we are going to measure success by how much someone thinks we saved in WC benefits then I'd agree this was a success in Durham. Of course we don’t have the data to know there was any connection between injuries during arrests and the introduction and use of the Taser. We simply have the stated conclusion. I’d like to see the details of usage. As Mike pointed out the main concern of citizens in Durham is what I've been pointing out, how they are being used. Like I've said before, I'm not anti-Taser, I'm anti-excessive force. When excessive force is used and results in killing even a criminal (still a human being) we move closer to being the same as what we Americans criticize: Communism. All of that said the Canadian research is opening up new questions about reliability, predictability and shelf-life. At least that's my opinion as to what the reports seem to point to. I’d like to see the internal research of the manufacturer. But I doubt that will happen without a lawsuit. Like any electrical restraint device, if it isn’t functioning as we expect it to then we must ask if it is a legitimate tool for law enforcement. Personally I do have to wonder why using a cattle prod is an unacceptable tool of law enforcement, but when manufactured into the form of a gun it suddenly is acceptable. I’m not saying a cattle prod and a Taser work the same, I don’t know the answer to that question, but that is an overall question in my mind that I can’t seem to resolve. Is it because the American culture is deep in history with gun manufacturing. I’ll reread the Durham news article and the Canadian research; I’d be interested in your thinking on their conclusions.

Leave a comment

Have an opinion? There are 3 ways to leave a public comment (or click here to email the author privately).

For information on acceptable commenting practices, please visit Lifehacker's guide to weblog comments. Comments containing spam or profanity will be filtered or deleted.

Method 1: Guests

Provide the information below. Your email address will not be published or sold.

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Method 2: Facebook Users

Connect using your facebook account.

Method 3: InjuryBoard Members and Contributors

Please sign in

Comments:

5000 characters remaining.




Subscribe to InjuryBoard Des Moines

InjuryBoard Des Moines RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Des Moines is brought to you by The Lombardi Law Firm

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
The Lombardi Law Firm (866) 735-1102 Ext 335 www.lombardilaw.com/
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Ames, Ankeny, Boone, Clive, Des Moines, Grinnell, Jefferson, Leon, Marshalltown, Newton, Osceola, Oskaloosa, Ottumwa, Urbandalte, West Des Moines, Winterset
4200 Corporate DriveSuite 112, West Des Moines, Iowa 50266 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address